tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8277922285316814036.post2447345580557883914..comments2023-10-25T01:00:47.839-07:00Comments on Irving Two Smokes Blog: No Room for Moral SentimentIrvinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03464006597711240043noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8277922285316814036.post-90711575363133757672014-05-06T13:21:43.542-07:002014-05-06T13:21:43.542-07:00Definitely points to a double standard for "m...Definitely points to a double standard for "moral disapproval" as a justification for law. I know you were being somewhat facetious in your claim that it is "difficult for me to understand", since the answer is obvious: In the case of animal cruelty, the black robes SHARE the voter's moral disapproval, but in the defense of marriage, they DON'T. So if he were honest, Judge Kern would say: "...moral disapproval is not a permissible justification for a law...unless I share that disapproval."Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11179533222327756656noreply@blogger.com